Grammar

How claims are held

After a looking, a sentence often arrives. This means. This caused. This was sent. Perception is not yet association. Association is not yet interpretation. Interpretation is not yet a claim.

Hold the claim at its size.

Perception

What is present?

Color, edge, sound, date, a beetle on glass. Stay with what arrived before a name, a memory, or a theory begins to speak for it.1

Association

What arose?

Magritte. A grandmother’s kitchen. A number you already love. It belongs to the encounter. It is not yet in the plate.

Interpretation

What might I make of it?

A reading. Several can live at once. Not yet a law.

Claim

What do I assert is true?

Hold it at its size. Some sentences stay with what was seen. Some grow larger than it.

World

Light, sound, objects, documents, events.

Observer

Attention, memory, culture, feeling, association.

House

Selection, crop, caption, pairing, sequence, timing.

Meaning

Why it mattered.

A pattern may matter before we know what caused it. Feeling is evidence of feeling. It is not yet a law of the world.

Mechanism

How it happened, if we can say.

Cause, coincidence, selection, base rate, a beetle doing what beetles do. Shared words are not shared machinery.

Meaning is not the same claim as cause.

Presence

Seen
Visible, audible, dated.
Felt
What arrived in the body.
Associated
What the mind joined. Not yet in the plate.

Record

Sourced
What can be checked, and when it was written down.
Pattern
What repeated. Out of how many. How common anyway.
Miss
What did not match. Ambiguous stays ambiguous.

Sentence

Interpretation
A reading. Not yet a law.
Analogy
Acorn to oak is biological. Destiny is another move.
Speculation
A maybe, named as maybe.
Question
What remains open.

When a theoretical word starts doing causal work it has not earned, the claim has already outgrown the looking. Psychoid is a name for a problem, not a demonstrated hidden mechanism.2

Notes

  1. James Hillman, Re-Visioning Psychology (New York: Harper & Row, 1975).
  2. C. G. Jung, “Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle,” in The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, trans. R. F. C. Hull, 2nd ed., vol. 8 of The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, 417–519 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969).